Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
The panic introduction of patented vaccines is an error by any standard of modern medicine. You have to test vaccines before rollouts at least five to ten years to determine the death rate. In three years of testing it could be the Black Plague or it may not be.  One year of testing or less for boosters means nothing. That is the real issue from the modern vaccine standpoint. It should not be rolled out except after exhaustive testing even by modern medicine’s own standards. Even then there are errors in judgement as the massive rise in autism is linked by many authorities to the other so-called safe vaccines that went through ten years of tests. Then, there is the question whether the vaccines based on the germ or virus theory is true, which if were not true, then the very concept of the vaccine as a preventive agent is false.
For example, the Polio Vaccine came in to prevent polio with the usual propaganda about antibodies, etc. yet the elimination of Polio has been connected to the discontinuation of the use of DDT on crops to destroy insects. If that is so, then the charges that the Polio vaccine has caused polio rather than cured has credence.
This issue on vaccines is not new. All England in the 19th century was being forced to vaccinate using Jenner’s cowpox vaccine opposed by Count Leo Tolstoy and George Bernard Shaw who called it a dirty form of witchcraft.
Here the evil spirit was converted into a germ or virus to use scientific garb. Jenner said that all of mankind would die if they did not use his cowpox inoculation which sounds familiar today, and Shaw said that it was a question of sanitation which is the meaning behind Deuteronomy 23:13 sanitary regulations. As people began to congregate in the cities they started to live amidst pollution not found on farms. For example, horse droppings were not cleaned up on the streets and coal was used as fuel that poisoned the air. Also the rivers were a source of plague being polluted with human and animal excrement. It was the hygiene movement that ended small pox and not vaccinations. You find today that the vaccinated are more likely to develop the so-called coronavirus than the unvaccinated.  That has been explained by describing the patented coronavirus in 2003 and the patented vaccines as bioweapons by Dr. David Martin.  Here is an introduction to his work next.
The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier
This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.
Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
This work was supported, in part, by a fund-raising effort in which approximately 330 persons contributed funds in support of the New Earth technology team and Urban Global Health Alliance. It is released under a Creative Commons license CCBY-NC-SA. Any derivative use of this dossier must be made public for the benefit of others. All documents, references and
disclosures contained herein are subject to an AS-IS representation. The author does not bear responsibility for errors in the public record or references therein. Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.
Over the past two decades, my company – M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations.
The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.1 In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.
“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”2
On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.
1 U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,537, filed May 21, 2000
Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.
In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement.
We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration. Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of
interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws.
These entities also were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desk-top” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario. We expected to see such a scenario
emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas.
This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism. All source materials are referenced herein. An additional detailed breakdown
of all the of individuals, research institutions, foundations, funding sources, and commercial enterprises can be accessed upon request.
The small pox is said to have wiped out the Indians but if you walked into an Indian camp in the 18th century the stench was unbearable it was so unclean and unsanitary. In 1877 the rise of small pox among the vaccinated in England disproved Jenner, and the “mandatory forced” vaccinations were ended. The desperate effort to vaccinate everyone today is to remove the unvaccinated control group that is not developing the variants as they will as in 1877 disprove the entire theory on small pox which was really eradicated by the hygiene movement. The variants are from the vaccination bioweapon according to fearless testimony by nurses.
In this sense the germ or virus theory is really a form of ancient witchcraft that the evil spirit will get you using the atheistical idea that modern science is true as witchcraft no longer holds water. We see this in cancer which is largely caused by inorganic elements introduced in the food chain.  For example, when Doctor Albert Schweitzer went to French Equatorial Africa to open his hospital in 1913 there were no cancers at all but in 1930 with the introduction of European processed foods the cancer rate rose from nothing to European levels. Justus von Liebig’s inorganic fertilzer plus added inorganic elements throughout the food chain caused the cancer but it was still treated as an evil spirit to be killed by an operation, or chemotherapy and radiation the latter two being proven causes of cancer. Doctors Schweitzer and Max Gerson conceived of a plan to change the diet to organic food and cured many cancers. The key as Steve Jobs understood is that if the liver had been destroyed by the pollutants it would not work which is why he had a liver transplant but it was too late.
This does not mean that mechanical medicine as in the emergency room of a hospital for gun shot wounds and automobile crashes is not worthwhile. Or setting a broken leg in a caste. Here the cause and effect is clear and so are the mechanical remedies. Doctors are at most mechanics.
Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
This essay is a review of the above article which we recommend reading.
Mary Shelly’s story of Dr. Frankenstein creating monsters is as real today as Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Man That Was Used Up” presages the synthetic man. These were prophetic writings. The synthetic man is the prototype of transhumanism. Transhumanism challenges the Biblical concept that God made man in a perfect manner, and his physical decline or illnesses are based not on his own errors or original sin in the Garden of Eden for which reason we die but primordial genetic deficiencies that can be cured by aided “evolution” . The evolutionary concept is man came from an ape and had evolved into a higher species based on the survival of the fittest.  The thought is that this evolutionary progression can be aided by genetically creating a new man that will be immune to disease and aging and live forever. At least that is the idea completely thought out.
The survival of the fittest doctrine came from Jeremy Bentham’s economics of free market competition leading to the emergence of the fittest company that would destroy all the others. (This, of course, is impossible based on the Biblical concept of the just price. But as we shall point out, the Bible has been destroyed in our society by the judicial system.) Darwin merely applied this to biology saying that the species developed from the lower animals to the higher ones culminating with man by struggle as in business competition resulting in the strongest company surviving and the other weaker companies just dying. The goal of transhumanism is to aid the biological evolution of man into higher and higher species. The genetic vaccine really is not a vaccine at all but an effort to change the genetic structure of people to make them superior enabling them to ward off diseases like viruses. In theory genetic vaccines can wipe out all disease and the supporters of this theory, Geoffrey Epstein or Bill Gates, can sin all they want but being transhumanized they will feel no evil or punishment. This is largely based on Francis Galton’s eugenics movement and was of course a primary basis of National Socialism in Germany.  We are dealing her mostly with theory here but the actual genetic vaccines now being used are a bioweapon to reduce the world’s population as demonstrated in footnote one. Population reduction of inferior human species is part of the program of today’s followers of Francis Galton.
The fallacy in Darwin’s doctrine was addressed by Houston Stewart Chamberlain who wrote a quite interesting book entitled “Die Grundlagen des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts” or “The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century”. Here he says we find an two equal possibilities which are man evolved from the lower species or that lower species descended from man. The evidence can be used both ways. Therefore, Darwin proved nothing and was an idiot. If you look at his profile with his sunken forehead reflecting his hyper-degeneracy, he has the appearance of an ape. (Here we refer the reader to the work of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Johann Kaspar Lavater entitled: “Physiognomy” that explains this phenomenon: the face reflects the soul as in the “Picture of Dorian Grey”.) In Darwin we have descent from a man to an appearance of an ape in one generation. This parallels in a sense Einstein’s “Theory of Relativity” in that the earth being the center of the universe with the sun and the moon and the stars circling around it or the earth rotates on its axis neither of which premise can be proven or so he thought.  What Einstein was saying was not quite different from Cardinal Robert Bellarmine who said Galileo had not proven his premise after having examined his writings at the request of Pope Paul V. The telescope cannot prove anything here. It could not be scientifically proven at that time if the sun went around the earth or the earth rotated so we relied on God’s Holy Scripture which was not disproven.
What was really going on was that the usurers were looking for a justification of their control mechanism of usury being licit. If the Bible was proved wrong on geocentricity then usury could be regarded as licit as the Bible was fallible.  In Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice Shylock did not demand his usury in court as that was not his main issue but control of Venice through usury that Signor Antonio was standing in the way of so Shylock wanted him dead. It is no different today for if the international financial system is challenged as when Colonel Gaddafy wanted to go to the gold standard as Dr. Mahathir bin Mohammed advocated without usury, he found himself dying in excruciating agony. He proposed this in 2009 to the African Union as its President and by 2011 he was dead. My sources say he was against usury also and so he clashed with the fiat dollar through which the US controls the whole world via CHIPS-SWIFT or should I say the Rothschilds and colleagues since 1776.  (See our “Who Hold The Balance of Power In The World” available on request. 88% of all world transactions pass through CHIPS-SWIFT with the dollar on one side.  I presented a paper on this in Dubai and the Saudi Central Bankers came up to me to say my presentation under the essay “Goethe, Faust and the Euro” available on request was superior to that of Mahathir but the Saudis could not adopt it or end up as Gaddafi. They were warned by the US many times.
Today we have proof of geocentricity in that the earth has been proven to not travel around the sun as it does not move at all according the the interferometer experiments of Michaelson-Morely who could not measure the aether resistance of the motion of the earth around the sun. It was a long established belief in science that in order for the light to travel from the sun to the earth it had to be carried by the aether just as sound is carried by the air on the earth. Einstein then made the revolutionary pronouncement that there was no aether which meant that the light traveled without a medium of transmission which was theoretically impossible.  This was latter refuted by Georges Sagnac by using the same interferometer to measure the rotation of the aether moving around the earth with the stars, sun, etc. which was called the Sagnac Effect. He measured that rotation by the aether around the earth in about 24 hours by its resistance thus proving the aether was there. This meant that Michaelson-Morely had absolutely proved the earth did not move around the sun. This still leaves open the relativity question as to whether what Georges Sagnac had measured was the earth’s rotation or that of the aether itself but it did decisively proved the earth did not move around the sun. I conducted my work on this subject with the physicist John Archibald Wheeler who totally agreed with these findings.
In the interest of being purely objective, I circulated the above paragraph to my Nobel Prize winning friends and here is the reply of Arno Penzias:
“M&M began the modern investigation of light, but had no way of
detecting the quantum properties of space. This is very heavy stuff,
that I don’t pretend to understand completely.” Arno Penzias.
Here is a write-up on Arno Penzias
Below is a write-up on John Archibald Wheeler
Footnote one: